Introduction

The Optimism ecosystem continues to evolve, pushing the boundaries of what blockchain technology can achieve, particularly in the realm of public goods. Retroactive Public Goods Funding (RetroPGF) is a pioneering initiative within this ecosystem, aiming to reward projects that have already delivered value but were not guaranteed funding at their inception. As the Optimism community grows, so does the methodology behind such impactful funding models. This blog explores the transformation from the previous RetroPGF designs to the newly unveiled format, shedding light on its potential implications for future development.

Previous RetroPGF Designs

The initial RetroPGF models, particularly the design used in RetroPGF 3, focused on direct community involvement in the funding process. Projects were nominated and then voted on by the community, leveraging a quadratic funding model to distribute the grants. This model emphasized democratic participation, allowing community members to have a direct say in which projects received funding based on their perceived value to the ecosystem. It was an innovative approach, ensuring that funds were allocated to projects genuinely enhancing the Optimism network.

Learnings from RetroPGF 3

The third round of RetroPGF brought to light several key learnings that have been instrumental in shaping subsequent funding models:

1. Community Engagement: The active participation of the community in the voting process was both a strength and a challenge. It highlighted the need for better educational resources to help community members make informed decisions about the projects they support.
2. Project Impact Measurement: Assessing the impact of funded projects revealed the necessity for clearer metrics and criteria. This would ensure that the community could effectively judge the success and contribution of projects beyond just their immediate outputs.
3. Funding Allocation: The experience showed that while quadratic voting is innovative, it also requires careful calibration to ensure that it accurately reflects the community's priorities without being overly influenced by a few large stakeholders.

These insights have been crucial in redesigning the funding approach to be more structured while still retaining the community's essential role.

New RetroPGF Designs

In contrast to the earlier models, the new RetroPGF design introduces significant changes intended to streamline the process and enhance its effectiveness. According to the latest updates from the Optimism governance forum, the upcoming rounds will adopt a more structured approach:

1. Tiered Funding System: The new format proposes a tiered system where projects are categorized based on their scope and impact. This ensures that funding levels are more aligned with the needs and potential impact of each project.
2. Enhanced Voter Participation: While retaining community-based voting, the new system intends to refine the voting process to reduce complexity and increase accessibility. This includes clearer guidelines on project eligibility and expected outcomes to help voters make more informed decisions.
3. Broader Oversight: An introduction of additional oversight by expert panels is also proposed to complement community votes. These panels, comprised of individuals with deep understanding of public goods and blockchain technology, will provide additional scrutiny and support in the selection process.
4. Feedback and Iteration: A continuous feedback loop will be integral to the new RetroPGF, with rounds designed to incorporate learnings from previous ones. This iterative process aims to constantly refine the funding mechanism, ensuring it remains robust and responsive to the community's evolving needs.

Conclusion

The evolution of the RetroPGF design reflects Optimism's commitment to fostering an innovative and supportive ecosystem for public goods. By refining the funding process, Optimism not only enhances the efficiency and fairness of project funding but also strengthens the community's engagement and ownership of the network's development. As these changes are implemented, it will be fascinating to observe how they influence the growth of public goods and the broader Optimism ecosystem, potentially setting new standards for community-driven funding in the blockchain space.

‍